Transocean Operatives Tesitfy at Federal Hearing

Deepwater Horizon oil rig following the April 20 explosion that led to

the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Transocean leased the rig to BP and

Halliburton was responsible for the cement job in the well

that some have called the cause of the blowout.

(Photo by US Coast Guard/Courtesy of SkyTruth)

US Coast Guard and Bureau of Energy Management hearings in Houston illuminate a kerfuffled Deepwater Horizon rig

By Nicholas Moroni

The joint US Coast Guard/Bureau of Energy Management federal hearings into the ongoing oil saga in the gulf continue today in Houston; however, yesterday's session was marred with a self-inflicted portrayal of disorganization among the leaders aboard the ill-fated Deepwater Horizon oil rig - which sank on April 20, killing 11 crew members.

Transocean - the company that leased the rig to BP - operatives were on the hot seat yesteday as federal officials pushed to reveal a lack of communication and organization that in no way facilitated the crew's response to the blown-out well. When US Coast Guard Capt. Hung Nguyen asked rig manager Paul Johnson matter-of-factly, "Are you clear who was in charge?"; Johnson replied, "I'm not sure."

The Los Angeles Times also reported that after the blowout, crew members were awaiting orders from senior personnel - orders they never received.

Daun Winslow, a Transocean division manager, claimed that Curt Kuchta, the rig's captain, turned to him to inquire as to whether or not he should perfrom an emergency disconnect of the drill from the well. Winslow also said he had to urge Kuchta to deploy the lifeboats.

The LA Times also published a series of troubling findings from a September 2009 audit of the rig that were summoned at yesterday's hearings - among them:

• Not all relevant personnel on the rig were knowledgeable about drilling and well operation practices.
• A review showed significant overdue maintenance jobs that required more than 3,545 man hours.
• No single person on board could account for which alarms had been disabled and for what reason.
• A warning on understaffing was issued saying that any further reduction of experienced personnel may be "detrimental to the performance of the rig."

The hearings proceed today, with BP and Haliburton representatives being called to testify, although the Houston Chronicle reported yesterday that Brian Morel, a BP drilling engineer, plans to exercise his Fifth Amendment rights by refusing to say anything that might incriminate him in any wrong-doing.

One of the Halliburton employees expected to testify today was supposedly in direct contact with Morel and other BP representatives about the cement job in the weeks leading up to the well explosion. A faulty cement job by Halliburton may have caused the explosion: if the cement is not properly set in a well, oil and gas can mix and surge up the well at extremely high rates of speed, causing an explosive force.

As the federal hearings continue, and perhaps the finger-pointing, the question of whether or not these companies and other BP associates will be shielded under claimants' agreements to waive litigation following a settlement with attorney Ken Feinberg's Gulf Coast Claims Facility - something Feinberg is still pondering.

Damages Lawsuits Filed Against BP by Spill Victims Tests the Claims Process

Damages suits against BP to be heard in New Orleans

By Nicholas Moroni

Hundreds of lawsuits filed by spill victims seeking finanical damages from oil giant BP will be heard in a New Orleans court.

Federal judge, Carl Barbier will hear some 300 cases that have been filed by spill victims seeking reparations for financial damages allegedly suffered subsequent to the spill. BP had hoped to avoid such litigation when it agreed in June to earmark a $20 billion escrow fund for spill victims. However, the Financial Times reports the aftermath of the sealed Macondo well has all the makings of Exxon-Valdez litigation.

BP had hoped to have the cases heard in Texas (its headquarters are in Houston): perhaphs in an attempt to appear before a friendlier jury.

Judge Barbier's hearing the cases initally carried some controversy, as well. BP maintained that Barbier's presiding over the cases, would be a conflict of interest because of shares that he held in Transocean (the operator of the sunken Deepwater Horizon rig) and Halliburton, which was involved in the Macondo drilling. Barbier has since sold the shares, and a Court of Appeals conceded that the sale of the shares posed no conflict.

The oil giant claimed it respected the decision, and that it "look[ed] forward to the cases proceeding as expeditiously as possibly."